this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
317 points (98.5% liked)

movies

2039 readers
328 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Adam McKay says the Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio-starring satire resonates with a widespread feeling of being deceived by government and media

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 141 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I liked the movie. The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead, but it was entertaining and meaningful.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago

The unsubtlety of the metaphor is the metaphor though.

I honestly think this will be a future classic if society survives long enough for such things.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead

Count me in as someone who missed the club to the forehead. I enjoyed the whole movie, then said to my wife "wow they really went hard on drawing all those parallels to COVID."

My wife nicely informed me that the movie was actually about climate change.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago

It's mostly about climate change, but I don't think you missed it if you thought Covid.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was a critique of american idiosincracy, while the world ending crisis is an analogy to climate change imo the main point of the movie is that the US is run by self-interested idiotas.

My problem with the movie is that they're obviously referencing the republicans when both parties do the same and that the movie is way too "white man burden" coded.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes for real biggest issue with it, its basically a harris voters power fantasy lmao

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 10 points 21 hours ago

Not subtle enough. Some conspiracy theorists think it’s about the Covid vaccine.

[–] TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

That's my issue with the movie. People who don't believe in climate change aren't going to have their mind changed by a club, but need to be tricked with something subtle. Nothing entrenches someone deeper into their views then calling someone an idiot or telling them they're wrong. The movie represents everything that's wrong with how progressives and the "liberal elite" like McKay try and convince people to come to their side. If anything, this movie probably just furthered the divide. Having Leo in it probably didn't help, conservatives love to point out the hypocrisy of his private jet and yacht.

I say this as someone who worked on the Bernie Sanders campaign and have talked to him about how to change non-progressives minds, although I'm not sure he's made much progress either. Maybe a little more than McKay.

So who is this movie for, if not to sway climate deniers? If it was really intended to let a liberal audience grandstand and circlejerk about how they're so much smarter then everyone else (which I'm not denying), then I guess it did a pretty good job of that.

Edit: full disclosure as a movie also didn't enjoy it, jokes were kinda too on the nose. Also just felt and looked like a Netflix movie, kinda plastic. Idiocracy was way funnier.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

I don't think it's made to change anyone's mind. It's made for people who recognize the issue and are angry at the lack of progress. It's just a but of funny stress relief for those people, while also saying "yes, it's and issue and it sucks." It's a "preaching to the choir" movie, and the choir appreciates being preached to sometimes.

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sometimes it's nice for people who believe in climate change to get a little validation, as a treat.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*Points at LA firestorm*

Take the treats back!
I’m tired of being validated year after year with record temperatures and disasters.

[–] TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Exactly haha, I get enough real life traumatic validation if I turn on the news for a second or look out my window

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So who is this movie for, if not to sway climate deniers?

This might sound crazy....but this movie is for people who like watching movies....

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Right? It is a comedy by Adam McKay. That alone is enough to draw an audience.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does a movie need to do anything else other than be entertaining?

I doubt the idea was to actually change anyone's mind.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

you're right, critique movies are nothing more than a treat to keep the discourse going instead of actual action.