this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
148 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

34862 readers
42 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 year ago (7 children)

No idea why people use and recommend Brave when Firefox exists. It's full of crypto and other unnecessary add-ons out of the box.

[–] medium_adult_son@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Since it is based on Chromium, but promises to keep the new Google tracking out in the future and maintain compatibility with extensions, I can see why it would be recommended. But only as a backup to access a site that won't load in Firefox.

we're back to the days when Firefox first came out, except instead of some websites only working with IE, they'll only work in Chrome/Edge.

[–] zer0nix@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's faster on older devices

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Firefox still doesn't have vertical tabs which I've found really useful for my workflow right now, so I use a fork called Pulse. Don't want to use any extensions for it when Pulse and other forks do it natively.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a million add-ons that add this, isn't there? I have one installed at home that basically makes it into what arc has

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably, but between the disabling of userChrome.css (even if you can enable it via about:config) and a possible conflict between other addons I use, I'm comfy with my Pulse setup.

[–] Reborn2966@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sorry, why not tree style tabs?

you can hide the normal tab bar and only have the tree style ones on the side

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago

I explain it in another comment, tl;dr: have to edit userChrome.css to give it a more streamlined look (and Mozilla calls that feature "legacy" in about:config since v69 which kinda worries me about that feature's removal) and I'm not sure if some extensions might conflict (Would it have issues with Simple Tab Groups). Pulse does it natively and really well, so I'm happy with it.

[–] dejf@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it's most likely not relevant with you anymore, since you're using Pulse, but have you tried any of the vertical/tree tab extensions?

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used Tree Style Tab but I didn't like having to change the userChrome.css to make it streamlined (i.e. hiding the tab bar), while Pulse does it natively and really well. I do have an extension for tab groups that imitates Vivaldi's tab workspaces though, not sure if those will conflict. (If you're curious, it's called Simple Tab Groups.)

Edit: There's also the issue of Mozilla calling the editable userChrome.css a legacy feature, which kinda worries me about its possible removal. Pulse having vertical tabs as a native feature skips that.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Brave has marketed itself more aggressively than Firefox did.

Additionally, Firefox' most devoted userbase can be quite bitter at times.