this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
US News
2081 readers
59 users here now
News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My understanding is that the courts have never actually ruled on the interpretation of the Constitution's language, and that the "natural-born citizen" phrasing is vague. It may simply be an attempt to get the current Supreme Court to rule on it in a xenophobic way
Natural-born might be read as 'born to naturalised parents' but I don't know much about US law except that the constitution offers unbound freedom to say anything you like unless the people that hear it don't like it.
Having listened to enough 5-4 podcast, I would venture to bet that they'll tie themselves in knots to justify exactly that line of reasoning, too.