this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
81 points (98.8% liked)

marxism

3745 readers
107 users here now

For the study of Marxism, and all the tendencies that fall beneath it.

Read Lenin.

Resources below are from r/communism101. Post suggestions for better resources and we'll update them.

Study Guides

Explanations

Libraries

Bookstores

Book PDFs

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Italian intellectual and political activist, founder of the Communist Party (Ales, Sardinia, 1891 - Rome, 1937). Thanks to the support of his brother and his intellectual capacity he overcame the difficulties produced by his physical deformity (he was hunchbacked) and by the poverty of his family (since his father was imprisoned, accused of embezzlement). He studied at the University of Turin, where he was influenced intellectually by Benedetto Croce and the socialists.

In 1913 he joined the Italian Socialist Party, immediately becoming a leader of its left wing. After working on various party periodicals, he founded, together with Palmiro Togliatti and Umberto Elia Terracini, the magazine Ordine nuovo (1919). Faced with the dilemma posed to socialists around the world by the course taken by the Russian Revolution, Antonio Gramsci chose to adhere to the communist line and, at the Livorno Congress (1921), split with the group that founded the Italian Communist Party.

Gramsci belonged from the beginning to the Central Committee of the new party, which he also represented in Moscow within the Third International (1922); he endowed the formation with an official press organ (L'Unità, 1924) and represented it as a deputy (1924). He was a member of the Executive of the Communist International, whose Bolshevik orthodoxy he defended in Italy by expelling from the party the ultra-left group of Amadeo Bordiga, which he accused of following Trotsky's line (1926).

He soon had to go underground, since since 1922 Italy was under the power of Mussolini, who would exercise from 1925 an iron fascist dictatorship. Gramsci was arrested in 1926 and spent the rest of his life in prison, subjected to humiliation and ill-treatment, which added to his tuberculosis to make prison life extremely difficult, until he died of cerebral congestion.

In these conditions, however, Gramsci was able to produce a great written work (the voluminous Prison Notebooks), containing an original revision of Marx's thought, in a historicist sense and tending to modernize the legacy of Marxism to adapt it to the conditions of Italy and twentieth-century Europe. Already at the Lyon Congress (1926) he had advocated the broadening of the social bases of communism by opening it to all classes of workers, including intellectuals. His theoretical contributions would powerfully influence the adaptation of Western communism that took place in the sixties and seventies, the so-called Eurocommunism. 🤮

Gramsci’s concept of hegemony. Gramsci saw the ruling class maintaining its power over society in two ways –

Coercion – it uses the army, police, prison and courts to force other classes to accept its rule

Consent (hegemony) – it uses ideas and values to persuade the subordinate classes that its rule is legitimate

Hegemony and Revolution

In advanced Capitalist societies, the ruling class rely heavily on consent to maintain their rule. Gramsci agrees with Marx that they are able to maintain consent because they control institutions such as religion, the media and the education system. However, according to Gramsci, the hegemony of the ruling class is never complete, for two reasons:

The ruling class are a minority – and as such they need to make ideological compromises with the middle classes in order to maintain power The proletariat have dual consciousness. Their ideas are influenced not only by bourgeois ideology but also by the material conditions of their life – in short, they are aware of their exploitation and are capable or seeing through the dominant ideology.

Antonio Gramsci Marxists.org :gramsci-heh:

Antonio Gramsci and the Italian Revolution :anti-italian-action:

Hexbear links

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

When did American evangelicals decide that empathy is evil? I keep seeing American Christians flipping out about how empathy is dangerous and wrong after that priest lady said that they should be empathetic to the weak.

I guess it is an outgrowth of Calvinism, but I hadn’t really seen it before Trump came along and they decided to get more openly unhinged about immigrants.

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Obviously they’re fascist, but they seem to have a specific grudge with the word empathy. I’ve seen them go on about how empathy specifically is bad as compared to compassion. It is just a deeply strange distinction to me and I don’t understand when or why they decided that empathy specifically is the enemy.

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

It’s facts don’t care about your feelings shit.
They think women are emotional while they are cool intelligent logic machine.
They convince themselves their cruelty is just rationality.

When I said that renaming Denali was just needlessly provocative and offensive to indigenous people I had a dude reply that such naivety would lead to harm”.
They could never end up explaining what about the position was naive or what harm is caused by not changing it to McKinley.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

Because empathy isn’t discriminatory and isn’t exclusive. Its a “resource” that is wasted on the “lesser” - the Christians of America are far more in line with the Nietzschean ideal than Nietzsche could have ever imagined

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When I look at what Christianity teaches it almost feels like it was a designed religion with the purpose of creating a perfect ethical system (at least the New testament stuff) but in a totally idealist framework. And the whole perversion of it by the evangelicals just shows why you can't build a "utopia" off of idealism

[–] Sebrof@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

May 31, 2019

spoilerIn all seriousness idk. You could probably trace it back to the multiple Great 'Awakenings' in America, or further back to Calvinism like you said and the dastardly protestants. I like to go all out and, before even Constantine, blame Paul for everything.

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

I can understand Constantine and Nicaea, but I think trying to pin this on Paul is a bit silly, he’s not nearly as responsible for the faults of modern or historical Christianity as everyone likes to claim imo