this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
911 points (97.7% liked)

Memes

46432 readers
1802 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would expect so. I said "but" as in, "even if we just do this and dont carry out other requirements immediately" kind of "but"

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i don't think we can get rid of them without socialism

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think a certain italian plumber says otherwise.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

The thing with Adventurism is that it doesn't change anything. The path to getting rid of billionaires requires organizing and toppling the system that necessarily gives rise to them, not by killing them as they crop up. Luigi played a valuable role in showing the Working Class that, actually, they have more in common with each other in their shared hatred of their natural enemy, but he didn't get us any closer to taking down that system.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

the billionaire is dead, long live the billionaire

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I don't know, it also seems very difficult to achieve world wide socialism. but then again it is also hard to cull people's desire to become powerful over others. there will always be those aspiring to become billionaires but yet it seems easier to motivate majority of humans to do away with billionaires then to convince them to accept socialism.