this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)
Collapse
413 readers
45 users here now
This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.
Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.
RULES
1 - Remember the human
2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source
3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.
4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.
Related lemmys:
- /c/green
- /c/antreefa
- /c/gardening
- /c/nativeplantgardening@mander.xyz
- /c/eco_socialism@lemmygrad.ml
- c/collapse@sopuli.xyz
- /c/biology
- /c/criseciv
- /c/eco
- Old posts https://lemmy.ml/c/collapse
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is that what they call science now? Speculating about the total number of deaths in the next 84 years? Here are some facts:
"Some 363,500 people die annually from cold, while 43,700 die from excessive heat." Even if the dooming calculations came true, the deaths from cold will still be considerably higher, and the overall death count lower.
The rest is making things up.
https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/01-08-2024-statement--heat-claims-more-than-175-000-lives-annually-in-the-who-european-region--with-numbers-set-to-soar
Seems the number of heat related deaths are much greater then you are indicating, and steadily on the rise.
It only seems so because they are making things up with models that don't resemble reality. All you have to do is compare the deaths of similar but warmer countries, and you will find less deaths from cold AND heat. Climate models = Propaganda
Everybody, listen to this random guy on the internet and ignore Nature, on of the world's most eminent science journals. This guy right here, he's the shit.
OK. Let ignore common sense and believe sites with no links to the actual studies. The who is simply lying. The data I provided is from a lancet study called "Temperature-related mortality burden and projected change in 1368 European regions: a modelling study". I only took the actual number and left out the "model" propaganda.
Also, the owners of nature.com are partners to the WEF, they have pre-defined goals. It is not that they are only interested in science.