this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
243 points (74.3% liked)

World News

32342 readers
544 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] meth_dragon@hexbear.net 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

shame on Time?

also, it’s not the exact same article. it’s a different article by a different author. you can tell if you bother to read it instead of just googling around until you found another article with a similar click-bait headline...

do you often lie to make your point, or is this a new experience for you?

[–] meth_dragon@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago (15 children)

sorry, i thought native english speakers would be more familiar with the concept of hyperbole. i will take the time to write a brief summary of relevant semantic techniques used in subsequent posts to help out the more rhetorically challenged members of our community.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know what hyperbole is, or exaggeration? Of course it's not the exact same article. Come on. The point is that multiple sources collaborate the main point, that opium production has fallen under the Taliban.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you know what hyperbole is, or exaggeration?

Yes, and I know when someone is lying but just says it’s “hyperbole” when called out on a lie, which is obviously what’s happening here.

Of course it’s not the exact same article.

so you even admit that they lied

The point is that multiple sources collaborate the main point, that opium production has fallen under the Taliban.

so what? there’s a famine right now, and there are obvious reason to shift production to a viable food source. twisting yourself into knots just to blame the US is absurd and not supported by the facts.

[–] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before 9/11 they had banned poppy cultivation. After America leaves, they ban poppy cultivation. During the occupation, lots of poppies are cultivated and processed into opium.

America consumes 80% of the world opium supply on average.

What conclusion do these facts support?

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What conclusion do these facts support?

that you will draw biased conclusions and assert them free of any factual evidence to back them up.

[–] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago (32 children)

You said American blame for poppy production during the occupation isn’t supported by the facts.

I restated those facts and asked what conclusion they do support.

So did the occupation increase opium production on purpose or just turn a blind eye to it?

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] Melonius@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this should help