this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
727 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3211 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Democrats Stansbury and Raskin introduced the “Nobody Elected Elon Musk Act,” which targets Elon Musk’s dismantling of federal services through the DOGE cost-cutting scheme.

It seeks personal liability for Musk, amid lawsuits and concerns over sensitive data access.

The proposal aims to protect taxpayers and critical federal operations against unauthorized actions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Not even gonna get to a vote. No one in the GOP cares. Good effort guys.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gee, I guess you should tell your representatives to just roll over and give up, is that what you suggest? As for me, and my representatives, phone calls every day. (https://www.5calls.org/) Protestors at the state capitol EVERY DAY. But sure, you do you. I'll be there, jumping back and forth fast enough that it looks like there are two of us, to make up for you slacking. And when you've had your down time, when you've recharged yourself, maybe think about joining us.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. The most important thing for dems to do right now is signal they don't like this. Their goal is getting the house in 2026 so they can run hearings for the second half of the Trump presidency.

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An even better goal is to grab a few senate seats too so they can go for a possible impeachment.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

they would literally have to win every single seat up in 2026 to have that shot.

considering the states with senate races in 2026, there's a 'nearest-to-zero as you can possibly get' chance of that happening.

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

just reclaiming a simple majority will be extremely difficult.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How will they do that though?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And even if they could, is impeachment going to somehow stop Trump this time, when it didn't last time and he's more powerful now? Sure, try whatever you can, but it still feels like the Democrats have not realized they're up against a massively popular Nazi movement that is already in government and conducting purges.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thats why you need both the senate and the house. Impeachment means nothing if you dont have both chambers because you need the other to actually enforce the impeachment

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The other issue would be getting ANYONE to actually remove him from office. I don't trust Congress to do it, I don't trust the judiciary to order it, and I sure don't trust any federal law enforcement agency to do it now.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is not massively popular. Don't let yourself be fooled into thinking that. These mouth-breathing troglodytes are in the very slim minority as far as the whole population goes. A lot of the people voting for him actually did not know what they were voting for - I was just talking to one of my friends overseas and they had no idea about quite literally ANY of the things Trump and Musk are doing. I told them about the Department of Education, USAID, the Treasury access, and the concentration camps, and then they interrupted to offer to let me stay with them and seek asylum from the government here.

Many people in the US were in the same boat. The Fediverse gives the people on it a lot of information most people don't ever see, and the more people learn about what's actually going on the more people will start to oppose it.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

It got a news article. That's better than crying in the fetal position for another 2 years.

They need more of this. How about an "Anti-Enabling Act"?

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks Copernicus