this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
1366 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20345 readers
4112 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders is touring Iowa and Nebraska to rally against “the oligarchy,” aiming to energize progressives rather than launch a 2028 presidential bid.

At 83, he seeks to shape the Democratic Party’s future, arguing it lost in 2024 by neglecting working-class voters.

He hopes to influence budget battles and the 2026 midterms, targeting GOP lawmakers in battleground districts.

With Democrats lacking clear leadership, Sanders’ prominence and focus on economic inequality could define the party’s direction in the Trump-Musk era.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 256 points 5 days ago (11 children)

I love Bernie and I admire his tenacity even at 83. But it is not nearly enough by a mile and we should not be relying on 83 year old to generate paradigm shifts. Please, for the love of God, other decent people with influence. Step up.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 139 points 5 days ago (22 children)

AoC has been highly visible in news and media so she's also giving it a go. I think one of our real issues is that leadership wise Jefferies is alright but Shumer is downright depressing.

Over the next two years we'll see a constant push by establishment dems to push out the progressives because centrist politicians on both sides want to keep a pro-corporate status quo.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 66 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (23 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president. I can see her running in 2028 and getting the grassroots support that Bernie enjoyed.

If anyone can get the youth out to vote she can. they need to focus hard on getting people registered though.

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

I thought I saw AOC calling out how bad an idea that was, back when Harris did it, so I don't expect her to make the same mistake

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

"I think there's plenty of people that aren't happy about that, and I think that is part of the nature of putting together a coalition," Ocasio-Cortez, who clashed with Cheney when they were both in the House, said.

"I don't love it, but that doesn't mean that we aren't on the same team, and we aren't on the same page when it comes to who is unequivocally the better candidate in order to win the presidential election."

https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-liz-cheney-harris-campaign-trump-1976031

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president.

She was old enough during the last election as well.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

aye, but there were no Democratic primaries in the last election

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

How about that.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They'll never allow AOC to win, just like they didn't allow Bernie.

[–] Mortoc@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose. It’s an uphill battle but one that we can win.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose.

If there's no primaries, no amount of support matters.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Granted the DNC "changed the rules" but are you forgetting the super-delegates overruling the majority votes in the primaries in 2016?

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Looking at how shitty the democrats are now, they don’t have the ability to stop her.

She just needs to win the working class. There are far, far more of us than the elitist snobs currently running the show on both sides of the aisle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So watch them run a pair of old white men, or find another member of the Clinton family that hasn't had a go yet.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well if we cant get Chelsea Clintin we can tap Hunter Biden right.

On a more serious note though, I would be comfortable with Michelle Obama from the getgo if she ran. I dont think she'd be easily controlled by the party. She had no time for their bullshit even when Obama was leading the party.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

She might be a popular option but she doesn't want the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was higher on Jeffries until I heard him interviewed by John Stewart. He said a bunch of nothing just like the rest of the party.

AOC’s interview was significantly better.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

From Jon's podcast? Wasn't that a horrible interview? Jon starts put saying "what's the plan instead of just saying you have to get the message out" and Jeffries doubles down on "branding".

Its really disheartening to see that bullshit gaslighting is still the MO of the Democrats going forward. Every word of that interview was more of the same old shit, and unfortunately Jon didn't push back on him at all.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yes it was a bad interview hence me saying he said a bunch of nothing.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Jeffries is horribly corrupt and a total stooge for monied interests. Don’t let his PR team fool you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 108 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Democrats succession planning was/is terrible, which is why an 83 year old independent is one of the few that can rally a crowd. I wish they had done better.

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In German class, in Arizona, my German teacher taught us teenage edgelords about Hitler. About his speeches. About his Charisma. He was a cult of personality. He could rally a crowd. If there aren't videos comparing trump rallies to Hitler, I suggest you make you're own comparison, and use your own judgment. There's a reason fascism wins. Hate doesn't prosper under progressives.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a friend who's really into serial killers and cults, like, he's listened to the recordings of the final moments of the Jamestown Massacre where you can hear them forcing the Flavor-Aid down people's throats as the rest gasp and choke and die in the background, and he says that Trump sounds just like Jim Jones. From his speech patterns to the tone of his voice, it gives him chills just how alike they sound.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Jonestown, or as I just learned it was also called, the Peoples Temple Agricultural Project

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it's not bad planning.

They continue actively keeping the progressives and the younger leaders out of power.

(This is about AOC, not Bernie, but we all know they did him dirty at least twice already.)

Pelosi Won. The Democratic Party Lost.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

WE are those other decent people with influence.

If you have any ability, run for office and start your campaign now. If not, find a progressive running and join their campaign.

If the democratic party won’t do their jobs, we need to fucking do it for them.

load more comments (8 replies)