this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
1155 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6668 readers
3343 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

She is a terrorist in the worlds largest terror organization which kills the most amount of civilians worldwide by a large margin.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And firing her specifically will fix this problem how?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If a terror group starts firing people to replace them with nepotistic appointments that means the organisation becomes less capable.

The commenter said "deserved" but what this woman really deserves is jail.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

People don't normally view serving in their country's military as a war crime. By your standards 99% of anyone is who has ever been in any modern military should probably be in jail, and that's not going to happen so why stress your little head about it.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

"They are committing massive war crimes but they do not see it as a crime. Thus it does not count."

By your standards ISIS and IDF soldiers don't deserve to go to jail either.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that she deserves it doesn't imply things will get better after her getting fired, it just implies she's a terrorist working for terrorists. Like, the name of the ship category you're commanding is "Destroyer"

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Destroyers were classically ships that defended a larger group. They would fight submarines and other ship to ship threats in order to leave cruisers and aircraft carriers to their work.

Destroyer was not, in it's original meaning, focused on ship to land bombardment (that's only part of the current generation because technology shrunk enough and nobody wants to spend a shitton of money on big boats anymore except the US)

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah no, I'm not a military enjoyer in general, so idk what destroyer means or what's the origin, I meant it more as a wordplay. But thanks for the clarification!