this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
1065 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6668 readers
2106 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (9 children)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (7 children)

She is a terrorist in the worlds largest terror organization which kills the most amount of civilians worldwide by a large margin.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

And firing her specifically will fix this problem how?

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that she deserves it doesn't imply things will get better after her getting fired, it just implies she's a terrorist working for terrorists. Like, the name of the ship category you're commanding is "Destroyer"

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Destroyers were classically ships that defended a larger group. They would fight submarines and other ship to ship threats in order to leave cruisers and aircraft carriers to their work.

Destroyer was not, in it's original meaning, focused on ship to land bombardment (that's only part of the current generation because technology shrunk enough and nobody wants to spend a shitton of money on big boats anymore except the US)

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah no, I'm not a military enjoyer in general, so idk what destroyer means or what's the origin, I meant it more as a wordplay. But thanks for the clarification!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)