Hoarding resources will be banned. If you start doing it, we'll beat you up before you can get enough to hire a private army. Also, only the most corrupt people would go work as a private soldier, because everyone's needs are met so there's no poverty to drive people to do bad things. You'd have to promise private security a lot of money to betray their nation for basically no reason.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So this anarchy is a self contained commune where nobody is allowed in that doesn’t agree with the rules. And if somebody breaks the rules, they must leave. This sums it up? It can’t apply to a country because that would never work. But to a small village, sure.

Also, hopefully the people outside the village don’t find ways of fucking with them (such as redirecting waterways that affect the downstream village).

[–] Beastimus@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, my understanding is that Anarchists want to break down governments into smaller and smaller bits in order to allow for more and more direct democracy and cooperation.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds interesting, and not at all what I would have thought of as anarchy. It definitely requires solidarity among its people.

[–] Beastimus@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I should say, that's not how all Anarchists view it, but as far as I identify as an anarchist, that's what Anarchism is.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I’ve definitely come to understand there’s a lot of brands of anarchism. I don’t think my initial opinion about anarchism has changed much, though, but I understand there is much more nuance to it.