this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)
Comradeship // Freechat
2288 readers
81 users here now
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I understand where you're coming from but I think there are multiple reasons why military- or guerilla-style combat training isn't really useful for the situations Marxist groups will find themselves in in the near future.
To the extent that armed resistance is effective, it is effective as a deterrent. If it comes to armed conflict, we will lose. This basic level of deterrence does not require training (at least, not extensive or dedicated training) - it only requires being armed.
Marxists in the United States do not (yet) have the support of the people. Becoming Maoist guerillas living in the woods and performing adventurism on police precincts and factories might be cool but it isn't really an effective use of personnel. The best use of a Marxist is as an organizer - a mover of people. Any action that turns a potential organizer into a criminal who cannot operate in professional society is ineffective as a revolutionary tactic.
Even if we did spend weeks doing combat training and arming ourselves, if the police or the military starting sending goons to our homes and community centers, there would be very little utility in shooting back. Our options would be (1). Go to jail and fight through the legal system, (2). Go into hiding, or (3). Flee the country.
If the cops raid your home, having combat training will not determine success, only how many cops you take with you. And cops are easier to replace than Marxists.
Very fair points.
I still feel like no matter how you slice it, there needs to be some kind of preparation. But I can't argue against your solid points.