512

submitted 1 year ago by TechCodecPawx@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MrMamiya@feddit.de 74 points 1 year ago

If Linux was dominant it wouldn’t be Linux. There would be more pressure to monetize and there would always be someone willing to sell out for that money. You can see this even in the Linux community today. I’m sorry I had to be so negative about it though, it sounds nice.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago

Maybe it should say, “If the world went open source, and capitalism went away.”

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

Even fantasy should have some limits folks c'mon now

[-] jamieWxyzt@kulupu.duckdns.org 9 points 1 year ago

Which is more fantastical? Unlimited profits and line going up forever in a finite world? Or capitalism actually ending so all lives can live free from subjugation?

[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

If windows didn't exist, linux would dominate with the problems you describe, and we'd still see this meme, but advocating for FreeBSD instead.

That being said, I like them both. It's been a while since I last used bsd, so I think it's about time I give it another spin.

[-] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure. I switch between MacOS and Linux regularly.

I'd reckon Apple's OS would dominate the "user friendly" space(not saying Linux is bad, just what everyone memes).

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Linux is already dominant on just about everything except the desktop, and it has yet to suffer significant enshittification.

Edit: Well, a bunch of Linux distributions have suffered enshittification, if that counts.

[-] Redkey@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Does this also apply to Android?

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure. I've only ever used the stock operating system on my phones.

[-] tool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If Linux was dominant it wouldn’t be Linux. There would be more pressure to monetize and there would always be someone willing to sell out for that money. You can see this even in the Linux community today. I’m sorry I had to be so negative about it though, it sounds nice.

This is a very Desktop/workstation-centric view of the situation and you're completely neglecting 3/4ths of the story. Linux is already hilariously dominant on the on-prem server and Cloud side of things. Like, it's not even close. Pretty much any website you visit, the odds are overwhelming that it's running Linux. Even Microsoft runs most of the underlying infrastructure for Azure and Github on Linux. Android is the #1 mobile phone platform in the world, which runs on, you guessed it, Linux.

And it's already monetized to the gills. Red Hat has multi-billion earnings per quarter, every quarter, and Canonical is almost certainly going to IPO this year.

It's already dominant in pretty much every space it touches and it has been for a very long time. Desktop/workstation is pretty much the singular exception to that.

[-] MrMamiya@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah man it’s more of what you might call an allegory for how capitalism works. Language is my thing, looks like Linux is yours. I’m sure this information will be very helpful for anyone who might read my post and mistake me for an expert. Thanks for your service.

[-] docAvid@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Who, exactly, do you think would "sell out for money", and why would they have the power to do so? Linux is huge, and the pressure to monetize is there now. Plenty of people have been trying to monetize Linux - and in many cases, succeeding - for decades now. Why do you think being dominant would change that?