this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1322 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

48594 readers
3525 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Fair enough, but I would say that examining what went right and what went wrong is an imporant duty for any socialist examining the USSR not just dismissing it outright. Many of the issues and problems with Soviet Union can be applied to any country building socialism as can many of the benefits. So we must learn what to keep and what to leave aside, as it remained Socialist until the very end of its existence.

And for what it's worth, I reccommend that first link I sent. I think what I described in that could be useful for you.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i still think you're assuming what my actual, real-life views are from a silly what-if scenario! i am never gonna be in control of anything more powerful than a barbeque.

but if somehow i got to mind control the president or something, yes, i'd take advantage of that brief control to eliminate as many capitalists as possible

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can't just kill Socialism into existence, though. That's Idealism, not Materialism. That removes the entire process of Historical Materialism, and erases the foundations of Scientific Socialism, as opposed to Utopianism. I recommend reading or revisiting Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i wouldn't be trying to will socialism into existence, though, i'd just be having a little fun :3

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's "tankier" than the "tankies" you demonize, though. Kinda just confused here.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ban this person for using a naughty word

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You got temp-banned from a different comm for breaking the rules, I don't think picking fights is a good usage of your time to be honest.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just pointing out your hypocrisy.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You understand the difference between actually using a word and referring to said word’s past usage by others, right?

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hypocrisy? Yes I understand it very well.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That you yourself used a word I was banned for using, because apparently it's so insulting it shouldn't ever be used. And you will twist the truth in knots to defend the fact that I was punished just for using the word tankie. Oops. There I go again. But I guess its okay to use again since you're doing it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Pretty different context, I was asking for clarification from someone who used "tankie" unironically to ask them what they meant, you used it as an unironic insult, and further this is a different comm.