this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

movies

3252 readers
710 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 1 week ago (7 children)

So many questions.

Are they going to call the movie “Helldivers 2”? because I haven’t seen Helldivers 1 yet.

Does this writer not know that there are already FIVE Starship Troopers movies, each worst than the last? News of a 6th film isn’t exactly stirring excitement in my loins.

Does Sony think claiming they’re “going back to the original book” is a good thing in this case? Heinlein’s novel has none of the political satire that Verhoeven injected into the story, and that audiences associate with the property. Starship Troopers played straight is… well, it would be the original Starship Troopers, but not nearly as interesting.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 week ago

Starship Troopers the novel was very interesting. It just wasn't the half-comedy the movie was.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I viewed the movie as a play on the propaganda within the universe of the book (roughly the equivalent of films like "black hawk down").

A movie playing it straight could be interesting. My only concern is how it will resonate with the current political situation. The original book was far more subtle in its view on fascism. It could easily turn into a fascist call to arms.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago

Verhoeven made the choice to make the movie a farce because he realized that making the movie serious would likely be interpreted as saying nice things about Nazis.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

. Starship Troopers played straight is… well, it would be the original Starship Troopers, but not nearly as interesting.

politely disagree.

the verhoeven film only explored the attack on earth superficially; they don't include the other species at all - skinnies (iirc?) and don't touch on the mobile infantry tech like the armor systems, flight, mini-nukes etc.

In the right hands, I think they could flesh stuff like this out to create a lot of interesting nuance and film fun.

Knowing hollywood it'll probably be wretched tho.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Making a video game movie and starting the first one off with "2" in the title would be a very video game thing to do.

Street Fighter definitely could have used the opportunity. It's one of those games that most people learned about from the second in the series and not the original game.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does that mean we will get helldivers2: the movie: the game?

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I'm interested in what the sequel would be called, "Helldivers2 2: dive hellier"?

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Right? The book reads like a futuristic Jarhead

[–] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe they'll do it like 'Troll 2' and just go right to the sequel

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -1 points 1 week ago

Could be good if they write Trump/Musk into it