this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1212 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66812 readers
4243 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
1212
OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)
submitted 5 days ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
492 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] azalty@jlai.lu 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's called paying for the content

[–] EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This.

I support AI, but I don't understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.

OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

But how will corporations like Disney survive without copywrites?! Won't someone think about the poor corporations?!

/s

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why? Nothing they've shat out is good for anything anyway.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

If not, AI is dead in the US

Technically, everything you write is copyrighted

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then I guess they can't use it... Unless the owner wants to cut them some kind of deal.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago

We'll see how it turns out, but yea they're in big trouble

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no, how horrible... AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm

[–] t0m4@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data.

Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't believe there's a future in AI at all.

[–] t0m4@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Why though? For me it’s already very useful. You can also see what boston dynamic does thats also very helpful in general.

Don’t be so ignorant.

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

You don't need to say anything else, I'm already happy with that outcome