this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)
Comradeship // Freechat
2333 readers
95 users here now
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because being critical of religion is not an ideology. Atheism (since 99.9% of "satanists" are just edgy atheists) is not an ideology. When you're an edgy teen it may feel that way, but in reality you can't build a political and ideological identity on what is simply a rejection of one particular claim. But since they tried to make atheism into a group identity they needed to actually add a whole ideological framework around their atheism. Their ideological conflict with communist atheists becomes inevitable when they start to advocate for extreme individualism and Ayn Rand style sociopathic egoism. That is always going to clash with communism regardless of any shared belief in the non-existence of a god or gods.
Or to put it more simply: being an atheist is just not sufficient grounds to guarantee compatible world views between different people and groups. I'm an atheist but i have more in common politically and ideologically with communist Christians and Muslims than i do with libertarian atheists.
I could not have said it better myself. Just being against things is not really enough to build up a society of substance and the little they do stand on is nonsense that'll scatter the masses anyway. It's cool for a couple of moments when you want to break out of a haunted religious upbringing, but a well-rounded ideology needs to develop later if you actually want to affect change and have an accurate analysis of reality beyond catering to self-indulgence.
Exactly. It's not enough to be against something, you have to be for something else. It's why i don't much like it when some people on the left just describe themselves as vaguely anti-capitalist. It's good to be against capitalism but what are you actually for? In the case of communists it is clear: we have a well defined vision of the kind of society we want to build. We are for socialism.