this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
131 points (99.2% liked)

sino

8259 readers
137 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I'd love to see what amount of that energy they expect to get back to earth as for what I understand is the the efficiencies for sending energy back like this is atrocious.

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Even if it's an absurdly low % of energy collected, guess what, it's constant and practically infinite on a human timescale

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Then they can just buld a bigger one. For free energy it is worth scrapping a few cruse ships worth of steel. The savings on decreased lung cancer would more than pay for it.

[–] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

NASA has already done research on efficiency, cost etc