125
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)
World News
35175 readers
489 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
100% agree! The EU has opened a pandora's box by going after elements like Le Pen and Georgescu. That is not the way! Address people's concerns, penalize huge corporations negative externalities and wrongdoings as it should... banning voices just exacerbates their grievances. I don't know about Le Pen, just dislike her incendiary immigrant rhetoric wanted to reduce drastically immigration is a valid stance in my mind, although I disagree with, but being anti-[fill_religion_or_color__here] is not). What I know is that the claims posed by Romania does not hold any water... There is no evidence presented to this day of Russian interference... just claims; with that any current government can also 'claim' interference and stop a candidate. Bad, bad times in the EU.
So like... She should not get any punishment for embezzling European Union funds ?
So like... when you apply law selectively that's a problem. For example, Christine Lagarde was found guilty of involvement in a corrupt 400m euro arbitration, received no sentence, and was awarded with the ECB governor job. https://news.sky.com/story/court-finds-imf-chief-christine-lagarde-guilty-of-criminal-negligence-10702431
Then there's von der Leyen who simply refused to disclose text messages she exchanged with the chief executive of Pfizer https://www.ft.com/content/72f0cb12-3753-42a9-aba4-7b3fb596e1cd
There are plenty of such cases and these people never face any punishment, but all of a sudden in this case there's a sentence handed down. Anybody with even a minimally functioning brain can see that this is politically motivated lawfare. If the law is not applied equally then it's no longer just.
This is because LePen is being condamned based on a law from 2016. (That she voted BTW)
The cases you mention here are older and cannot be judged through this law in France.
If you think Le Pen is a unique case in France, I have a bridge to sell you.
Christine Lagarde was found guilty of negligence, not embezzling. Patrick Balkany or François Fillon are better comparisons, and they both also got condemned to a period of ineligibility (10 years, twice of Lepen's mere 5 years). They're also both of the more "traditional" right wing party, not usually considered extremists.
What Lagarde was doing is pretty clearly embezzlement, and I would be willing to bet that majority of the EU politicians use their funds for their campaign staff. If you think this is an isolated incident, then you must've been born yesterday. That's the beauty of a corrupt regime, there's dirt to be found on any politician. All you have to do is decide where the spotlight shines and eliminate the competition. This is no different from what's happening in Turkey now.