this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1055 points (86.9% liked)

196

5050 readers
1043 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1055
We're at war rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.world
 

Edit: The admins have told me if I don't say this was an accident then they will remove the post.

It's is verifiably an accident. It is also extremely convenient for the people she threatened.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dying from epilepsy is only rare in circumstance that a person isn’t close by. Chances of Dying from epilepsy is quite scarey in that there is a possibility on every single epileptic seizure that a person could die.

People with epilepsy have a chance of dying if they are awake and no one is around fast enough to do anything.

Almost lost a neighbour this way.

if they are asleep there is less a chance someone might come by. Because everyone else is asleep and unless someone is in bed with you they wouldn’t know to wake up and do something to help.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

97% of seizures spontaneously stop in less than 5minutes. People on medication ( that they actually take), seizures tend to be shorter and in the setting of partial onset epilepsy (which is usually the case in adults) they are also more focal or shorter at breakthrough. So yeah, technically any seizure can kill you, but in reality they very rarely do. Also, the family of this person was comfortable having her alone in her home suggesting this hasn’t been a regular occurrence etc.

Of course, this doesn’t mean anything but again, it is unusual.

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The experience shouldn't offend the data. The data comes from the experience. If you keep discounting occurances it will seem rare and unusual. that's perpetuating a fallacy.

A close friend of mine has a son who hadn't had seizures in a few years and they thought his seizures were being managed and that they found the right medication and treatment. Then suddenly he had a grand mal but luckily while they were out someone else was around. Took them all by surprise. he had a cardiac arrest and everything.

This does count.

It becomes less rare when you stop belittling experiences about it. It should absolutely be taken more seriously.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It means maybe take off the tinfoil hat for a bit.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, just because something is unusual, it doesn’t mean that another unusual explanation is automatically true.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

97% of seizures spontaneously stop in less than 5minutes.

Does that mean that 3% of seizures require intervention?

I would imagine the probabilities aren't independent, but if they were, the probability of someone staying in the 97% for 10 seizures in a row is 73.7%. 20 seizures in a row drops the probability to 54%. Under that math, even if the probability of something going wrong is low in any given seizure, someone who has many seizures in a lifetime will likely experience something serious at some point.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Does that mean that 3% of seizures require intervention?

I should have put over 97%. But yeah for a generalized tonic-clonic seizure lasting longer than 5 minutes is called "status epilepticus" and that is a risk of lasting injury and thus warrant intervention. Just not the kind that bystanders are able to provide.

I would imagine the probabilities aren’t independent, but if they were, the probability of someone staying in the 97% for 10 seizures in a row is 73.7%. 20 seizures in a row drops the probability to 54%.

Yup, probabilities are not independent and if those clusters of seizures happen minutes to hours from each other, the risk of injury increases further. Also, with more and longer seizures the epilepsy tends to become increasingly harder to manage. But epilepsy comes in many shapes and forms so it depends on the specific kind. The adults who die of epilepsy usually don't die "unexpectedly" meaning they have certain comorbidities that increase the risk of dying (e.g. heart disease), etc.