Finland plans to leave the Ottawa convention that bans antipersonnel landmines, following similar moves by other neighbouring states bordering Russia.
Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said on Tuesday that exiting the 1997 treaty would allow Finland to “prepare for the changes in the security environment in a more versatile way”. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, all among the staunchest allies of Ukraine, quit the agreement last month citing the potential threat from Moscow.
Orpo said Finland, which now guards NATO’s longest border – 1,300km (800 miles) – with Russia since joining the military alliance in 2023, is not in immediate danger. However, Moscow poses a long-term threat to all of Europe, he stated.
Once it exits the treaty, Finland will be able to stockpile landmines again to have them at hand should the need arise.
Orpo also announced plans to increase Finland’s defence spending to at least 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2029, indicating that spending by that time will rise by about 3 billion euros ($3.24bn).
The announcement came as United States President Donald Trump doubled down on his effort to halt the war in Ukraine, which has led to fear that a pause in the conflict could offer Moscow the chance to rearm and target its neighbours.
Finland shut its land border as Russia cast its new membership of NATO as a dangerous historic mistake. Helsinki has since accused Moscow of weaponising migration and extended the closure indefinitely.
However, on Monday, Finnish President Alexander Stubb – who has repeatedly warned about the need to be tough with Russia – told his British counterpart, Keir Starmer, that Helsinki needed to “mentally prepare” for the restoration of ties with Russia.
He said the timing of any rapprochement would depend on when the war in Ukraine ended, but said there was “no denying” that Russia would always be Finland’s neighbour.
Deploying landmines on your own territory is one of those things that reminds me of spiteful behavior like salting the earth of your own home so no one else can use it.
I can imagine EU doing that too at some point
Spiteful for sure, but still a technically viable tactic. Soviets did it to great effect against the Nazis who had less food and supplies to plunder before winter. It's analogous to blowing up bridges, roads, and other infrastructure on your retreat.
Not that I think these are morally good things, but perhaps morally neutral - What if you're bordering a fascist and irredentist regime that is imminently planning to invade? This may not be Finland's case, but would, say, Hezbollah not be forgiven for employing a few tactics like this to deter the IOF?