this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
1320 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

6721 readers
1608 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You want everyone to treat you like fox News treats their viewers, that's the kind of pandering campaign you want, but for your issues.

This is politics, this is for adults because it matters.

Shove your 'oh what a bad campaign' bullshit up your ass, everyone should be expected to vote for sanity, blaming politicians for not pandering is literally the problem that gave us WWE politics in the first place.

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I blame them for being republican-lite but go off.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You win politics by slowly moving the needle, making the other side unviable.

Our mistake was not being zero tolerance for southern racism.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why would that have looked like? Hopefully less pandering to Republicans.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

It would look more or less like what the Republicans have been doing, relentlessly pushing to the right because the left is fractured and can be counted on to never unite.

The evangelicals hate Liberals so much they decided Trump is the ultimate Christian.

That is unstoppable political power, and it doesn't exist on the left.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The campaign absolutely sucked. I voted. Both can be true.

Harris nationally basically threw the election when she said she wouldn't have done anything differently than Biden. People wanted change, and she offered none.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well we certainly got change.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That we did. And I'm pretty sure it's not the kind of change the people who voted for Trump wanted. But they wanted change, and only one of the candidates offered that.

Harris and rhe DNC fumbled the ball hard. It was their election to win since they had the incumbent advantage, popular support for Jan 6 enforcement, and tons of lawsuits against Trump. All she needed to do was present a tangible plan for what her administration would change. Inflation was coming down (but prices obviously weren't), the "economy" was tenuous, rates were high, etc. People wanted to know what she'd do, and her answer of "nothing different than Biden did" didn't instill confidence. So she lost swing voters and didn't motivate her base to turn out.

She lost the election because she fumbled the campaign. She was winning for most of it, and lost in the last month. She needed a rallying cry, and she exuded "more of the same." People suffering don't want more of the same.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The DNC fumbled hard and I am frustrated with the people who decided a worse outcome seemed better than the status quo.

Absolutely agreed.