this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23647 readers
114 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ideally from a reputable brand, and in a compact form factor (something the size of a smallish flash drive, no big antenna sticking out)

I was gonna get the TP Link Archer T3U, but the driver developer left a README note saying there's no guarantee it will work in USB 3.0 mode, and I don't want to gamble on buying it to find out

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why does it need to be USB 3.0?

[–] buh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To get the best throughput, or to at least try to see if it would be better than USB 2. I have a working USB 2 adapter, but it's just annoyingly slow sometimes, especially when I'm trying to stream video while uploading/seeding, or even to just transfer data to a different machine on the wifi network.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I found this pretty interesting website that has lists of devices, on the right side panel of a specific page it shows the "probable linux driver" https://techinfodepot.shoutwiki.com/wiki/TP-LINK_Archer_T_series

So for example (there are many other better ones on the website) the TP-LINK Archer T3U supposedly gets higher speeds. But TP-Link also listed above 480 Mbps for a USB 2.0 device I saw, so I don't know if they're lying or what.

edit: lol I forgot this was the device you mentioned in the post.

It sounds like that device's driver got merged into the linux kernel.

Honestly it probably works lol.