this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
260 points (96.1% liked)

Casual Conversation

3146 readers
89 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fancy cupcakes are 70% icing, really not that nice and a waste of money

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

πŸ’€

this is some real /r/suicidebywords material right here

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

does that community exist here, or is this just wishful thinking?

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ha, my point is that we ought to distance ourselves from Reddit if we can. It doesn't seem to exist but anyone could make it. It probably wouldn't be a good fit for my instance, though, haha, so I shouldn't be the one.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

that makes sense, and I tend to use /c/ when there is an actual Lemmy community (even if I'm referring to the more general idea meant by that community) precisely for that reason - but I'm also not sure we can entirely distance ourselves from Reddit, most of our users are from Reddit and are still active on Reddit, and Lemmy is a clone of Reddit. Maybe that's all the more reason for trying to show how we are distinct, but we also depend on our Reddit-ness as a community here, including in-jokes about subreddits and the general culture that existed on Reddit and which has partially migrated to places like Lemmy.

And no worries about not starting the community on your instance, I think it makes more sense to create a community once there is interest rather than create another empty / dead stub of a community for the sake of completeness.