this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)
LocalLLaMA
2953 readers
17 users here now
Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.
Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.
As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What are the benefits of EXL3 vs the more normal quantizations? I have 16gb of VRAM on an AMD card. Would I be able to benefit from this quant yet?
AFAIK ROCm isn't yet supported: https://github.com/turboderp-org/exllamav3
I hope the word "yet" means that it might come at some point, but for now it doesn't seem to be developed in any form or fashion.
There's a "What's missing" section there that lists ROCm, so I'm pretty sure it's planned to be added
That, and exl2 has ROCm support.
There was always the bugaboo of uttering a prayer to get rocm flash attention working (come on, AMD...), but exl3 has plans to switch to flashinfer, which should eliminate that issue.
^ what was said, not supported yet, though you can give it a shot theoretically.
Basically exl3 means you can run 32B models, totally on GPU without a ton of quantization loss, if you can get it working on your computer. But exl2/exl3 is less popular largely because it’s PyTorch based, hence more finicky to setup (no GGUF single files, no Macs, no easy install, especially on AMD).