860
White House calls Amazon ‘hostile’ for reportedly planning to list tariff costs
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
860 points (98.9% liked)
News
29047 readers
4319 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good thing this isn't a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.
That possibly reframing "no taxation without representation" a bit but I don't entirely disagree with the sentiment.
How are billionaires being taxed unfairly, and without "Representation," when they own our politicians?
I don't know, I don't see anyone saying that here.
Yeah, you're full of shit.
didn't washington own like the western 2/3 of Pennsylvania?
And Ohio. He was by far the wealthiest man in the Colonies during his lifetime.
He was one of the richest Americans who ever lived. I don't if that is still true, but it was at one time.
So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?
There's a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.
Yes, he was filthy rich, not in liquidity, but in assets.
But yes, he was approached with the offer to be King of The Colonies, and he refused. We can admire that.
Well, his wealth wasn't exactly liquid, it was mostly tied up in wilderness land.
Fortunes in those days weren't in bank accounts, or stocks, or index funds, etc. They tended to be tied up in assets like land, slaves, crops, etc., and cold hard cash/gold, stored in a box somewhere, like under the floor.
They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.
Why would they care about "Representation?"
They have more wealth than 1,000 people could ever spend in 1,000 lifetimes.
He backed down to keep profits from MAGA Cult Members flowing in.
Because being that greedy is a mental illness.
he was only ever representing putin, and MSB never the billionaires in the us.
In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn't seem like it in practice... :(
Not anymore.
Watch the Republican Town Halls of the few who still have the courage, or narcissism, to hold, and even though they're being booed down, they still have the arrogance to try the lecture their constituents.
I think they're trying to instigate riots so they can declare Martial Law via The Insurrection Act.
Literal only in the terminological sense. We elect “representatives” but they don’t actually represent us in any meaningful way.
Don't they? Look around you.
1/3 of us. 1/3 are in opposition. 1/3 is apathetic, thinking it doesn't matter.
When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they'll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn't get more "no representation" than that.