this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
135 points (97.2% liked)
Slop.
482 readers
669 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not against her specifically. I'm against her nonsense DNC appointed policy. Running to the right had never once been a winning strategy. The entire Schumer Strategy is a unmitigated failure.
Run on progressive policy and you cannot lose. It took the entire Democratic machine to stop Sanders.
The DNC is a Corporation. It's full name as shown in court documents is the DNC Services Corp. They are controlled opposition. If they lose, it's because they chose to. It is a conscious decision on their part. They have the numbers. The analytics. The polling. They know how to win. They know how to keep control indefinitely and they actively choose not to because their own interests as a corporation line up with republican fiscal policy. Tax cuts and empire. Those are the frontline policies that matter to them. It's why they appear toothless. It's why Schumer is sending "strongly worded" letters to Chump instead of rallying democrats to play hardball. It's why they're all desperate to stop David Hogg from going after those do nothing democrats.
Why not? Her history as DA and AG is terrible, even if her policies weren't outright absurd she's proven herself to be irredeemable and untrustworthy.
Given the pool of candidates the dems want to draw from, is irredeemable and untrustworthy really all that specific?
No. Not in the slightest.