this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
856 points (98.1% liked)

Games

38422 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

2 years seems like a nightmare for indie developers. Do you want a bunch of AI Chinese cash grabs pushing things out like Hollow Knight 2: Microtransaction Edition or Stardew Valley Romance Sims? Because without IP protection, indie developers will get creamed.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't remember all of the differences, but I think you're conflating copyright, patent, and trademark here. Software patents should almost not be a thing, but copyright and trademark should still exist.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Copyright if elements of the game such as 3D models, images and code have been copied.

Trademark if the name of the game is used (i.e. "Stardew Valley Romance Sims").

Patents for game mechanics.

As a side note, personally I think that game mechanics shouldn't be at all patentable

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 6 points 20 hours ago

in most countries, afaik, you actually can't patent game mechanics, for the same reason you can't patent rule sets for boardgames:

because they are essentially just logical connections. it would be like patenting math, which is also not allowed, for very obvious reasons. (with some very specific, very niche exceptions)

japan is just plain weird and wrong about their patent system.

that's why all of the lawsuits about this stuff are happening in japan; not just because that's where the companies are, but because japanese copyright law is (especially) fucked.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 11 points 23 hours ago

I don't believe those indie developers have any patents.

[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 22 hours ago

You don't need a patent to protect the IP of a game. That's what copyright is for.