this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
194 points (97.1% liked)

science

19463 readers
1402 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Each sphere has an estimated lifespan of between 50 and 60 years, with partial replacement of components every 20 years or so.

The concept is fascinating, but what I'm most curious about is how they achieve that longevity in seawater. Benthic life really loves to settle and build on hard surfaces.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Every time I see these “We’ll do X in/around the ocean” projects I think, “These people have not spent a lot of time near the ocean.”

[–] Dryfire@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are 2000 year old Roman concrete piers that are still just hanging out in sea water. So it's possible if you find the right mix.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The concrete isn’t the problem. Like mentioned above, the sealife growth is. Also, metal and moving mechanicals are savaged by seawater (and the sealife growth). Keeping things working on the surface of the water is difficult and expensive. Water pressure makes that even worse. Maintenance requires divers which are likewise very expensive.

[–] Dryfire@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Really good points. I was only thinking of the structure of the concrete... Sea life growth is a whole other ball game!

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Benthic Life needs to be band/album/movie title.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, you can't see BENTHIC live.
They don't have a tour planned.
https://lifeforcerecords.com/archives/artists/benthic/

[–] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course they’re not touring. They’re sessile.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Narrated by Sir Attenborough.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago

I think the sea has a huge potential of energy production that is totally untapped because of that.

There are tons of ways to produce energy with sea water but as soon as you put any moving parts in water it gets corroded and covered with benthic life (I've learned a word today). Every project of ocean energy production dies because of that.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would it particularly affect the performance if the sphere ends up covered in barnacles or coral? It's what's inside that matters (it's just a big hollow tank).

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you fill and empty with raw seawater on the regular then you will have plenty of opportunity for growth on the inside and a constant supply of new water with fresh nutrients meaning everything is going to want to grow into the water inlet and clog it.

Maybe they will sink a giant bladder of sterile water together with the hollow sphere, and then figure out a way to make the bladder not fail for 20 years?

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I envision issues with turbulent flow over surfaces that work best with laminar flow. It sounds like a turbine or pump system is used for these spheres.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Decoy spheres.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would imagine it wouldn't matter how many barnacles and stuff are on it. That's the outside. Everything important is inside, I'm assuming the intake water will be screened or filtered in some way.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Most benthic life (by number) start as tiny, motile creatures. Screens would reduce head pressure and require maintenance. Barnacles of all kinds, as an example critter, settle on everything to which they can adhere. I'm guessing the engineers considered these complications since there have been past power project failures because of sea life. I wish the article went into those mitigations. If it's somehow a non-issue by nature of the design, my curiosity is even more piqued.