this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
68 points (95.9% liked)

Asklemmy

47997 readers
787 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sick of having to look up what country an author is from to know which variant of teaspoon they're using or how big their lemons are compared to mine. It's amateur hour out there, I want those homely family recipes up to standard!

What are some good lessons from scientific documentation which should be encouraged in cooking recipes? What are some issues with recipes you've seen which have tripped you up?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] b34k@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All solids should be listed by weight.

All liquids should be listed by volume.

SI units only. (Grams for solids, mL for liquids)

More graduated cylinders and volumetric flasks in the kitchen please.

[โ€“] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Why would you want anything by volume? Mass is so much easier. 50 ml of honey is way more annoying to get into a recipe than dumping it right into whatever container the rest of the ingredients are in while it's sat on a scale.

[โ€“] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

5ml of vanilla is a lot easier to measure than by weight would be

To be honest, I don't think I've ever measured vanilla, it goes right in the bowl, lol. Small quantities are often easier by volume, though, for sure.

[โ€“] b34k@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Sure, we could say viscous liquids can use mass. Iโ€™d say most liquids with a viscosity close to water will be easier to measure out by volume than risk over pouring when going right into weigh boat / mixing bowl.

[โ€“] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

I agree. Mass all the way. It's especially complicated when the liquids are viscous and stick to your measuring vessel.

The only time volume is permitted is if it's too light for a typical kitchen scale to measure.

We should all use Einstein-Landauer units.

[โ€“] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I thought SI Unit for volume is m3

True, but square and cubic units are inconvenient due to the way prefixes work. Use liters to solve that problem.

[โ€“] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

same thing, one cubic centimeter is one ml

[โ€“] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But 1L is not 1mยณ

Liters are non-SI

[โ€“] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

1L is 1dmยณ (10cmยณ)

They aren't "official" SI units but i'd much rather see liters then teaspoons

Yeah I would also preffer liters even over mยณ. Was being pedantic on you saying it's the same thing

[โ€“] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

To be completely pedantic, neither of those are SI compliant. A quantity-unit combination is not a single word and the two should always be separated by a space.