Asklemmy

43817 readers

873 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What would happen if a law was passed that said all content determined via algorithms had to be open source? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 year ago by mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but even then, what's open source? The algorithm?

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely wasn't clear enough, and the question is phrased too broadly. It was intended to ask about content suggesting algorithms, like YouTube or TikTok, so people would have a better idea of why they are seeing the content that appears, if that makes sense.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, right! Thank you for the clarification