this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
576 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

70389 readers
5175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isaaclyman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article does not mention paraplegia.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why does it have to? All current bci's are designed for the disabled, why would this one be an exception?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So rich people can make money on the hype and sale of a new product to the masses?

you know, like literally everything?

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's where regulators step in, do you honestly believe elon musk would not be implanting healthy people with neuralinks if regulators would allow? They won't, this is tech for people whose lives are so awful that not having one is worse than the things that may go wrong, for a very, very long time.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't think an old nazi with 32 felonies would be the leader of the free world, I've been surprised a few times in my life but nothing really does it anymore.

Can you say your statement could hold up against 50 years of future trends? Transhumanism? Fanatics who want it so bad that they make it law?

For that matter, who's regulating Ai right now?

No, it won't hold up for 50 years, but if you don't want one don't get it?