this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
211 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

70300 readers
4479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 4 points 26 minutes ago

"As part of your onboarding process, we're just going to implant your Company ID. That way, for your safety, we'll always know where you are. If you hear a buzzing sound, that means return to the office immediately. Reduced work speed will produce a mild reminder shock.

"Welcome to the Corporation."

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They should make a big facility to test the implants

[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe have an AI overseer, they could name it Gladys

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 47 minutes ago

You'd need people to solve puzzles to really put the implant through its paces. Something involving blocks should be sufficiently simple to play around with while having lots of variation.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago

I wish I could close or move windows around with my brain. It would be so nice.

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I’m only doing the brain chip thing if it can fully transplant me to a Matrix level of simulated reality and get me out of this current hellhole permanently.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"has long toyed with the idea that your brain should be more connected to your PC"

seems like billionaires' wet dream to be honest

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

But imagine how easy it would be to ~~track you~~ serve you more personalised ads.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Props to him for trying it himself instead of having someone else do it and take all the risk

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 3 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

Wow Valve was on a great series of wins, this is a rare loss for them. Who wants this? Best case people will be sitting in meetings playing Half Life 3 in their brains. I don't really want that.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 minutes ago

If it gets me closer to Half-Life 3, then pipe that shit into my brains

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 39 points 3 hours ago

"Alright, the implantation surgery was a success, now all we have to do is fire up the remote activation. Throwing the switch in three... two...

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 36 points 4 hours ago

Finally the logo makes sense

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 62 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

TIL Valve is into brain chips.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 4 minutes ago

To be fair, I think it's specifically Gabe who's been obsessed with brain computer interfaces for the past many years. Obviously it's his company, so Valve by extension participates.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 34 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The Valve Deckard was a little more ambitious than had been originally anticipated.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 50 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

How the hell is this not the Onion?

[–] killerscene@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

isn't the verge the same as the onion?

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 46 minutes ago

Nah, the verge is less credible

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 32 points 5 hours ago (11 children)

Might be a bit of an unpopular opinion, but I don't really see a problem with brain implants. I wouldn't put anything my brain in a thousand years, but if someone's willing to accept the risks, why not? They have the potential to significantly improve quality of life for many people.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 minutes ago

That's the challenge with technical advances. It's not just solving the technical problem, it's also solving the societal problem.

If you look back into history, Automated elevators was a major panic until people got comfortable with the idea.

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It could become the standard in time, like smartphones. I can easily see it becoming the norm, making it more expensive and difficult to use a normal smartphone instead of some brain implant, much like how "dumbphones" are coming back as overpriced and gimmicky. Maybe they pullsomething similar to the "green bubble" like apple did, alienating people without implants.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

This is a very important concern. Tech companies already exert entirely too much power over society through smart phones and their accompanying apps. The damage they would do with direct access to your neurons is incalculable.

The only thing that comforts me is that I firmly expect that society as we know it will entirely collapse before this technology can really be capitalized. It's not a very comforting expectation, but it somehow bothers me less than the idea of techno-fascist corporate feudal states taking control of everyone's thoughts.

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 42 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

It's exactly like AI. Could the technology be useful were it to be used in service of goals that would serve humanity? Absolutely. Will it be used by billionaires in a way that will be harmful to most people in order to further entrench their power? Most definitely.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nomiya@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Another problem is abandonment. When the company goes under or the device becomes outdated and they no longer want to support it the device can't be easily removed. If the device was fixing a disability, the person's disability will be reinstated.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect we will end up in a situation where you have a "mount" that is connected to your brain. The mount is able to be serviced by any company in the field, because it is standard. From there, you have the actual chips which are going to be relatively easy to install and remove, eventually you might even be able to do so at your house. This allows competition while allowing being consumer friendly.

As for the disability side of things, it just means that when your chip is no longer serviced you easily swap it for another companies whose are.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My piercings are against God but technoligarchs think they will convince those people brain chips you can swap out on the fly are okay. lol

Anyways I’ll take one brain chip here in like 5 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

If I lived in, say, Iain Banks's post-scarcity anarcho-communist utopia The Culture, I'd get a neural lace in a heartbeat. But living in this capitalist dystopia that most of us does, I don't trust corporations to not use this sort of technology for domination over the populace.

For perspectives on how it might go (general vibes, not the same technology) I recommend HYPER-REALITY (6 mins short film) or David Brin's Existence novel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›