this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
1788 points (97.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35888 readers
3059 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube disallowing adblockers, Reddit charging for API usage, Twitter blocking non-registered users. These events happen almost at the same time. Is this one of the effects of the tech bubble burst?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pup@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because the days of just shoveling money into various silicon valley projects in the hope that maybe they'll turn a profit eventually is over. Big investment firms now want an actual return from their investment, and because of that, tech companies are desperately trying whatever they can to turn a profit from these massive services that are also very expensive to run. That usually comes in the form of changes that makes things harder for the users, but is significantly more profitable for the companies that run them.

[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For some more context, this is probably tied into at least two things. One is that the bubble was starting to be recognized for what it was. The other is that interest rates became positive again, so the bar for a good investment suddenly went from "I'll be happy if I get my money back" to "I want to be paid back double within 20 years".

[–] wizel10@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm just waiting for the ads bubble to explore. There is very little real ROI. As a user, my eyes and mind are well training to avoid seeing any ad that traverses the adblocker, I never clic on any PROMOTED content nor on any link of the ad-top results. Always REJECT cookies I've the option. The advertising companies pay on what they believe I'm seeing, but on what I really see (and care). Just waiting for the day they realize and stop wasting money and disturbance.

I agree with you, but recently started a Distillery and I'm able to get a positive Roi from Facebook ads. To be fair, I have a very compelling offer. Also to be fair, it's the first time I've ever made something that can generate a positive Roi so your point stands.

The hard part for advertisers is there's very few options to get your message out these days as traditional media has died and people spend so much if their lives on their phones.

Also I think it's worth noting that if you are on Lemmy you are probably in a class of more savvy and - dare I say - intelligent than the average bear scrolling Facebook.

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Seeing that so much of the traffic on the big social media sites these days is bots, I'm thinking the day that bubble pops is close. Advertisers tend to get upset if they're spending good money to serve ads to bots that will never buy anything. That, and ad-blindness like you mentioned, and blowback because ads are getting really fucking obnoxious right now. And with Elon's platforming of hate, and Reddit's nerfing of moderators, advertisers are going to see their ads displayed next to some nazi toxicity, and that'll make them upset.

The advertisers will run their analytics, and find that the ads they're paying for are doing less and less in terms of actually getting people to buy,

[–] KD_14@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No ROI?? Google 60b, Apple 99b, msft 72b. You are delusional.

[–] wizel10@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've expressed wrongly. My intend was to refer the companies paying for the ad not the ones managng the ads. Also ROI wanted to refer to the return for the investment on ads. Edit: typo

[–] Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People like you and I are very rare. Advertising is effective. About 5% of people buy something because of any given ad (if you think about it, even we can probably admit to buying something now and then after seeing an ad). If you pay a little to reach millions of people, that converts into a really good ROI.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's not just the current state that's the problem.

If these companies didn't spend 20 years not worrying about making a profit, they'd have had sustainable growth and be able to stand on their own long ago.

At this point no one could turn them around, it's too late.

And it's not just the lack of big money. The entire startup business model is the main investors immediately selling very small chunks to normal people. With the whole economy in the shitter, the big investors after an IPO are going to have to hold for a while before they can sell without nosediving the price.

[–] KD_14@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I disagree. The valuations might be lower but tech is still where it's at and it's the only field getting exponentially better.