this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
446 points (79.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7263 readers
621 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

even with this personal evidence, you get defenders downvoting the story - not because it doesn't add to the discussion, buy because it doesn't suit their narrative.

Not really commenting on the claims made in this argument, but this is anecdotal evidence. Meaning that someone who claims all pitbulls are sweet and docile because of their personal experience is just as valid of an argument as someone saying all pitbulls are bad because of their personal experience.

I don't really care about pitbulls one way or the other, but I find it worrying that a lot of the times the debates against the breed follow similar argument structures to those utilized by racist pulling up FBI crime stats about black people.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personal evidence is anecdotal, I never said it wasn't? There is nothing wrong with someone sharing a personal story to add to the discussion was my point.. Which I thought I made clearly.

Ah yes, 'being cautious about dog breds bred over a hundred years of more for violent traits is much the same argument as being cautious about black people' false equivalence again.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Personal evidence is anecdotal, I never said it wasn't? There is nothing wrong with someone sharing a personal story to add to the discussion was my point.. Which I thought I made clearly.

Right, but you were dismaying people who refute your anecdotes "because it doesn't fit their narrative", which is a perfectly valid thing to do with anecdotal evidence, as it is itself an attempt to build a narrative.

being cautious about dog breds bred over a hundred years of more for violent traits is much the same argument as being cautious about black people*' false equivalence again.

Racist would often say the similar things about black people in America. Slavery lasted well over a hundred years and slave owners would often have slaves who were brought up to be prize fighters.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I wasn't. I was pointing out how pathetic it is that people downvote comments that they don't like because it doesn't fit their narrative - downvotes are for comments that don't add to the discussion, and personal stories are absolutely valid.

Am I writing in a coded language that's hard to decipher?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

downvotes are for comments that don't add to the discussion, and personal stories are absolutely valid.

Lol, what are you the mayor of reddit? You don't get to decide how people utilize this platform.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is Lemmy, not Reddit. Lol are you lost?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Lol, my point was that it was a reddit ass comment. Nobody here cares about the "rules" about up votes or down votes.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's always a tool that wants to be faux intelligent and inject a racist flavor into every discussion.....

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

There's always people trying to defend the use of racist dog whistles.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is not a thread of statisticians. This is a thread of people sharing experiences about dogs. Expect people stories aka "anecdotal".

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Then also expect people to dismiss that anecdotal evidence as irrelevant