this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
896 points (92.2% liked)

memes

15444 readers
3705 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, but... Why? Is that a theorem that I don't remember from school?

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Take this shape as an example. The "square" in question consists of AC, BD, the outer AB, and the inner CD.

Point (5) means that, since the lines AC and BD are radii of the concentric circles, the arcs AB and CD should have the same inner angle. That's because the angle COD is equal to AOB.

Since, the inner angle is the same, then the outer AOB should, by definition, be 2π - (the inner AOB), because that's how radiants work; a circle is 2π rads.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Thank you, I need an evening with wikipedia to either understand what you wrote or ask more questions, because I don't see why is that, but now I need to learn/remember that stuff

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you! But why arc CD and arc AB length should add to 2 PI? Or why does the angle COD times two is 2PI if that's what you meant?

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Point (5) is not about the arcs' lengths. It's about the angle they create with the center.

Also, I never said that COD * 2 = 2π. I said (inner COD) + (outer COD) = 2π rads