this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025

384 points (98.5% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

3773 readers

192 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

PartyCat@sh.itjust.works

384

But I remember it! (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.works

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 110 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The episode was also omitted from the streaming service Disney+.[51] The Slate journalist Isaac Butler criticized the removal as "an offense against art and the medium of television, and part of a growing trend of corporations using their consolidated power and the death of physical media to do damage control by destroying works by troublesome artists".

Stark Raving Dad - Wikipedia https://share.google/bkT2WOa5qDZKeQICR

Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

One excerpt I enjoyed reading.

Michael Jackson guest-starred as Leon Kompowsky, but went uncredited (credited as John Jay Smith) for contractual reasons; his role was not confirmed until later. Jackson was a fan of the show and called its creator, Matt Groening, offering to do a guest spot. Jackson pitched several story ideas and wrote the song "Happy Birthday Lisa" for the episode. Leon's singing voice was performed by a Jackson soundalike, Kipp Lennon, due to Jackson's contractual obligations with his record company.[3] The episode references Jackson's career, with Kompowsky singing portions of the songs "Billie Jean" and "Ben".

Side note, why does this link above go through Google? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Side note, why does this link above go through Google?

Android browser share button doesn't copy the URL as shown. It prefixes the title to the clipboard content to help hide (behind "too long text") that it secretly, unprompted, uses the share.google link shortener / tracking service.

I got bit by it within the last week. Fuck that feature.

I think it used to have a way to actually copy the URL, but most mobile browsers are making that harder for a variety of reasons.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 hours ago

I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They do this with sunny, a bunch of sunny episodes are gone because of racial stuff, one including where Dee pretends to be Puerto Rican. As a Latino I found that episode hilarious and im more offended that they removed it.

If they removed the Simpsons Michael Jackson episode, they’ll probably delete the Sunny episodes with P Diddy

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Also, Community, which is especially absurd in the case of the episode where Chang dons black facepaint to play... a dark elf. Guess it was thought that any real dark elf viewers could be offended.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked.

https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/

http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context)

[–] no_username@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago

also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why did you short url a wikipedia link with google?

[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 24 points 1 day ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Apparently Google does that now with the share function automatically

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Cheeky cunts, aren't they?

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

nightmarish

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

It's not even really shorter.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone.

and people will blame the wokes/DEI/whatever

[+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is a decades old story.

The show runners themselves pulled the episode because the thought of Jackson using The Simpsons to get to kids was "icky" to put it lightly.

Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago

Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit.

The news corporations had a major hand in framing Michael Jackson - who was literally innocent. So if the creators removed someone because corporate made money by pretending he is guilty, it is corporate censorship.

https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even remotely true. Disney pulled the episode in March 2019 after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland premiered.

[+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney,

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already

Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter."

Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book.

That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

parties suck tbh

I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole