this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
79 points (97.6% liked)

Cybersecurity

7568 readers
200 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Potential conflicts of interest, no "smoking gun" as headline implies... Yet again.

Do I trust Telegram? No.

But there's less evidence of wrongdoing at the moment by orders of magnitude than WhatsApp, etc.

I do appreciate the conversation, but holy hell the same connect-the-dots is never made about WhatsApp. Makes me wonder who's pushing these stories.

Good journalism would cover the issues with all the mainstream comm systems.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 18 points 17 hours ago

Good journalism would cover the issues with all the mainstream comm systems.

That's not what this piece is about though. It's not a comparison, it's specifically about telegram. Their CFO has a contract with the FSB, do with that what you will. Durov has also said that he's never been back to Russia since, that's been proven false, he's been back more than 50 times.

This article is basically a summary of the report it links to.

Fwiw I don't use WhatsApp either, I use SimpleX with Signal as a backup.

[–] amlor@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

That investigation was conducted by russian journalists in exile. It was specifically about telegram because they have sources and it is the most relevant messenger for their readers (including people inside russia who largely assume that telegram is safe). No conspiracy here.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The answer should be use signal that has been configured in a hardened way. Everything else can't be trusted. Hell even with signal if it's really sensitive Encode with pgp using their public key then send through signal then they decode using their private key.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Waiting for simplex to mature but yeah currently signal is the best

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The founder of SimpleX unfortunately seems to be full MAGA. I don't want to touch that project with a 3 meter pole.

Matrix isn't doing too well either. Might be time to start a completely new project.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The founder of SimpleX unfortunately seems to be full MAGA

I don't do these purity tests. Simplex has better architecture over signal. So as long as that holds true, I will be moving my crew over there once apps are polished

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Anything architected by fascists and their supporters is suspect. Maybe it looks good now but, such an individual would be more likely to quietly push malicious changes in the future.

[–] TurboLag@lemmings.world 2 points 17 hours ago

This is the normal level of quality you can expect from Newsweek, unfortunately.