this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
39340 readers
247 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm unsure how I feel about this. I think whether this is beneficial or a net negative will end up depending entirely on how it is enforced.
What do you think could be negative about it?
It will make it extremely risky from a liability standpoint to operate any platform that allows user content.
The EFF has a bunch of writeups on these types of laws. This is the last of a 4-part series on them: Link
Fediverse operators would for example be extremely vulnerable to lawsuits, because almost none of them can afford teams of lawyers to deal with claims, true or not, that they failed to enforce content policies.
Depending on how the laws are written, anyone who could find a piece of objectionable content (which will vary by jurisdiction) could sue the platforms. This makes it very appealing as a route to shut down platforms you dislike, especially if they're niche.
It consolidates power under large corporations like Meta and Xitter, who can afford to handle legal threats.
It also makes those large corporate platforms unappealing, which is a very good thing for those of us who have always said that federation is a half-step towards proper decentralization.
It works only for big tech. Small forums, for example, often can't comply with such regulations.
Consider a Brazilian Lemmy instance. They will have to remove everything anyone complains about.
There's no way to tell legitimate requests from illegitimate and as soon as volunteer admins are overwhelmed with requests, they will have to automatically delete any post that they are notified about.
All the power is on the side of the complainant. Nonprofit Lemmy hosts would go bankrupt in minutes trying to fight it.