this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
50 points (90.3% liked)

Asklemmy

49587 readers
209 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As in, doesn't matter at all to you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

"Y'all"

I will die on the hill that it's more efficient and neutral than the alternatives.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

English has to bend over backwards to make up for the fact that it doesn't have a natural plural 2nd person form.

Ye Y'all Youse (Dublin)

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

"Y'all" and the plural "all y'all" are part of my daily vocabulary. And I'm in no way of southern origin.

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For years I have said that y'all is the best thing to come out of the south.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Yinz is at least as efficient

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

First we're all like "Thou is too casual, gotta use the plural second person instead." Then oh no, turns out number in pronouns is actually useful sometimes, but thou sounds old fashioned now, so we just gotta re-pluralize the second person. And then you get y'all.

I like y'all, but I almost wish we could just bring thou back.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I recently realized that w’all needs to be shakespeared too. Following the pattern of other languages, y’all and w’all are missing in English.

Also, I shakespeared the verb shakespeared, in reference to Shakespeare making up new words by following patterns among other words.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

I won't argue against w'all. I'm fine with it in principle. But it's not something I think I've ever said, or ever heard anyone say.