this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
671 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
3279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Now here's the exact problem with the so called "personalized" ads, that Google and Facebook serves what the advertisers think you want to see, instead of what you actually want to see.

This is the fundamental conflict of interest which the obvious conclusion is that online banner/video advertisements doesn't work, and has never worked, because ultimately, no matter how many times you shove ads in people's faces via a thoughtless machine, you can't "trick" people into liking something. What people want is thoughtful, sincere recommendations by real people, which is why we have seen the rise of sassy brand Twitter accounts being so successful for a time: because there is a real person behind it.

(Of course, it's really funny if you take blatant advertisment to its logical extreme, and even that seemed more effective.)

Of course, Google and Facebook will never admit that they've been lying to everyone and themselves for more than a decade, because to do so is to admit that their entire business of Web 2.0 was built on an absurd and illogical premise of again, if you show people ads for things they never asked for a thousand times, then you can brainwash them into liking something.

In other words, Google and Facebook's entire advertisment business model, if you really think about it, is really no different than pick-up artist logic, and. They. Just. Won't. Go. Away.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Turns out though you can absolutely trick them into believing conspiracy theories with social media ads.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Learn the TRUTH about this thing you’re already primed for by your bias!

click

Holy crap! He’s a alien! U cud tell frum the eyez! 👁️👁️👀👽

[–] FracturedEel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can absolutely trick people into liking drugs too

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fuuuuuuck the Sacklers.

[–] DryTomatoes4@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty much every industry works by tricking people into liking things.

Like the razors with four+ blades on them, people buy them cause the commercials say "more blades is better".

People wouldn't seek out extra blades if they weren't tricked into liking it. They are objectively worse than single blade razors.

[–] Rev3rze@lemdit.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. If it didn't pay off these companies wouldn't keep shoveling money to Facebook and Google to show their ads time and time again. Marketing is expensive. If it didn't at least break even then nobody would be doing it anymore by now. Obviously it works, otherwise I wouldn't ever know what the fuck a squarespace or a goddamn raid shadow legends is.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The ads that I mind the least and the ones I find the most effective are sponsors for creators that I like. Short sponsor segments really don't annoy me as much and I have actually tried a couple products that have advertised that way.

That said, almost all of them sucked in the end but that's another subject entirely.