this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
155 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
155
AI crap - Why ML will make the world worse, not better (drewdevault.com)
submitted 1 year ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There is a machine learning bubble, but the technology is here to stay. Once the bubble pops, the world will be changed by machine learning. But it will probably be crappier, not better.

What will happen to AI is boring old capitalism. Its staying power will come in the form of replacing competent, expensive humans with crappy, cheap robots.

AI is defined by aggressive capitalism. The hype bubble has been engineered by investors and capitalists dumping money into it, and the returns they expect on that investment are going to come out of your pocket. The singularity is not coming, but the most realistic promises of AI are going to make the world worse. The AI revolution is here, and I don’t really like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I disagree. If we replace this writer with ChatGPT4, it would generate a more balanced article.

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More balanced articles are not necessarily better though. I'd dather read two conflicting opinions that are well thought out than a mild compromise with unknown bias.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

I'd dather read two conflicting opinions that are well thought out

That's where it all falls down of course. Because these opinions are anything but well thought out.

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Why would ChatGPT be more “balanced,” what does “balanced” mean, and why is it better?

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

More balanced than what?

ChatGPT ingest lots of articles from the web and newspapers, identify patterns in the text, and generate relevant reply based on what it ingested.

I expect ChatGPT to perpetuate biases found in its training data, and don't see how it'd improve balance.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I mean is that the article was full of negative bias.

ChatGPT 4, when used with care, can take into account different opinions, both positive and negative.