this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
154 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
37
AI images are getting harder to spot. Google thinks it has a solution. (wapo.st)
submitted 1 year ago by Peaces@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The tech giant is among companies pushing out AI tools while promising to build more tools to protect against their misuse

WP gift article expires in 14 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/5UW77

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems a lot of people are misinterpreting this.

The goal is not to protect the general public from misinformation. The goal is to prevent the pool of new training data from getting TOO contaminated with AI generated images, which would make it worthless for training new AI

[–] jana@leminal.space 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article itself makes the connection:

As the 2024 presidential campaign ramps up, concern is quickly rising that such images might be used to spread false information.

Though, I guess shame on us for expecting better journalism these days.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 1 year ago

Who knows, probably a paid article

[–] Mirodir@lemmy.fmhy.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that:

The tool embeds a digital “watermark” directly into the image that can’t be seen by the human eye but can be picked up by a computer that’s been trained to read it.

Is gonna be helpful for keeping AI generated images out of training sets. It would require the people who make the model to actually implement that tool into their model.

I don't think most researchers not affiliated with google will chose to do that.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 1 year ago

Most major developers of AI generated imagery, at least the corporates, will do it as they share the common interest of not polluting their sample data. Open source imagery might make it optional, but the functionality will be implemented. Either the PRs will be submitted by one of the corporations, or marketing like this article will convince the devs to implement it.

Remember, they don't need EVERYBODY to implement it. As long as this reduces the amount of unmarked AIgen images by a reasonable percentage, it's worth doing for them.