this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
1244 points (99.3% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6599 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I use ad blockers and open source privacy focused software whenever I can but occasionally I have to use computers that don't belong to me or an older phone where my usual applications aren't installed and seeing all the advertisements just feels dirty and dystopian.

I think the worst ads are the text to speech ones that say "Download this app today". The unblinking energenic people saying you can make a living at home are probably a close second.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The person who was instrumental in the development of modern advertising was also involved in the notorious little Albert experiment. That really says a lot about how unethical modern advertising is on a psychological level. As a psych major myself I am constantly disgusted by how manipulative and toxic advertising is. It actually troubles me how we've essentially just accepted this as part of our society now.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Albert_experiment

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

"The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child."

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a documentary called "Manufacturing Consent" that is an interesting look at the PR and advertising industry that goes into the psychology of it.

Though some of them have no subtlety. Even as a teenager, I remember noticing the insidiousness of minivan adverts. They weren't selling vehicles, they were selling the idea that a new vehicle will make your kids want to spend time with the family again. It was probably because I was a teenager at the time that I noticed it because I thought minivans were lame and knew I'd resent having to go for family rides just because we got a new vehicle that I thought was dumb anyways.

But these advertisements wanted to convince families to spend money they may or may not have been able to afford for an emotional result that was at best going to be short term even if your kids had undergone enough brain trauma to get excited by minivans. Eventually the novelty would wear off and they'd want to go back to eating paint chips or doing whatever kids who think minivans are cool like to do. And then the lonely parents are stuck with a vehicle that reminds them of the thing that made them sad and have a new incentive to get a new vehicle to help them forget about it.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never got that from minivan commercials. They mostly focused on storage capacity without needing to get a full size van, not really family. Family was more incidental because someone without a bunch of kids didn't need the space.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, to be fair that might have been one specific commercial or a trend that has since passed. It's been a while since I was a teenager.