this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1208 points (86.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9680 readers
1302 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Assuming the needs of a living space is the same across both populations, this graphic seems disingenuous. The pixel count of the apartment suggests it could fit 6½ of the homes per floor. Across 9 floors that's 58 homes worth of square footage.

I assume the homes have garages, which would not account for living space. But garages don't account for 42% of a homes' size.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But garages don't account for 42% of a homes' size.

You should see some of the houses around here. Sometimes, the garage is more than 60% of the whole house.

[–] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For that to be true, you'd have a 2-car garage attached to at most 400 SqFt of living space...

Or in other words, for a home with a reasonable 1500 SqFt of living space, you'd need at least an 8 car garage...

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. Sometimes they even have 3 car garages. They are funky as fuck. Like apartments with multiple garages attached.

[–] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Car parking isnt needed because there’s nowhere to go

[–] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

True, but what I'm saying is that there are losses in livable square footage represented in the apartment. A home's SqFt excludes the garage, so a 1500 SqFt home is actually 1740 SqFt with a 1-car garage. I.e. a 1-car garage only takes up 14% of the area underneath a roof of a 1500 Livable-SqFt house. Yet, the represented apartment has lost 42%.

That implies that if the the houses in the picture are 1500 livable square feet, then the apartments are 1009 livable square feet; a ⅓ loss in livable area.

Apartment Complex = 58 Homes' worth of area including garage (1,740 × 58 = 100,920 SqFt)
100,920 / 100 apartments = 1,009 SqFt per apartment
[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, double the pink block. Now what?

[–] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Then you'd be closer to genuine compared to what this graphic shows.