this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
588 points (95.9% liked)
Not The Onion
12358 readers
297 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's true. But "on average" in circumstances like this is meaningless; "on average," a person is male. But I think we can agree that some women do exist.
On average, a person is female.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/#:~:text=Projection%20estimates%20calculated%20using%20the,US%20Census%20data%20for%202021.
Whoops thanks!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8O4UWeAglU
It’s not meaningless, we have a quantifiable metric and we average it. Men are stronger than women on average
It's not meaningless, but not meaningful enough for a legislative definition of sex. The law must be consistently applicable to people who aren't "average".
It's meaningless in terms of legislation and enforcement.