this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
571 points (94.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19512 readers
354 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
571
Programming Languages as Essays (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by Inductor@feddit.de to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnomalousBit@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

First time I’ve ever heard someone call a for loop “weird“. They’ve been around for 50 years 😂

The whole point was on readability, not trying to make rubocop be quiet. Sure, .each is great, but I’m not sure about it being shorthand. What did you save? Like 3 characters? I find the for loop more readable unless I’m method chaining.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not in ruby, the for loop was initially put there to make it friendly for people from other languages and is discouraged. It's just syntax sugar on top of each.

By shortand version I meant

array.each(&:to_s)

(although in this case I'm not calling puts anymore)

edit: lemmy keeps putting the & there, but you know what I mean

[–] AnomalousBit@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Not in Ruby

It’s valid syntax, it’s part of Ruby. It’s easy to read and familiar across many languages. Write what you want to write, I’m not sure why you feel the need to finger wag.