6
submitted 1 year ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Summary: The Linux Foundation is gradually becoming a shadow of Microsoft, just like the Open Source Initiative, where most of the money comes from Microsoft and the official blog promotes Microsoft, its proprietary software, and Microsoft’s side in a class action lawsuit over GPL violations (with 9 billion dollars in damages at stake).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] heeplr@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

no geeks or Linux developers left in the Board (it’s just ‘suits’ and corporate actors)

what could possibly go wrong?

[-] Gleaming0167@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's not like the foundation has any technical say in the kernel.

[-] victron@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That's the funny part, they exist just for show.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Well the Foundation does employ Linus and Greg, so it's not just entirely for the show. They paychecks are real (I hope!)

[-] Mkengine@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the ignorance, but who has the technical say then?

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Linus Torvalds acts as dictator for life. The problem is, and this is what Vim is currently grappling with, what happens when your open source software project with a dictator for life nears end of life? One might assume the Linux foundation becomes the new governance structure. That certainly seems to be what some people think Microsoft is banking on.

Here's my prediction: three kernals will arise competing for who gets to be the continuation of Linux. One by the current Linux foundation, one by a current individual contributor to the kernal, and one by a new organization founded to be a grass roots development effort of Linux. Following this fracturing, another existing project will gain prominence as an alternative kernal. Maybe that's FreeBSD, maybe that's Redox, I don't know. The point is the fracturing of no one knowing what the canonical Linux kernel they should be contributing to will give another kernel an opportunity to gain new users and contributors. The most likely winners are whatever new continuation project I described are, or the alternative kernel that already exists

[-] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thing is, there is a line of succession for Linux Kernel, Linus is more of a Q/A manager for determining whether to merge code or not, and they most likely never yield to Linux Foundation, because why the hell would they want to let some corpo suits tell them what to do especially if they don't have the technical literacy to do the job in the first place? If corpo try to meddle with the development process of Linux Kernel into something of a hostile environment, then developers of Linux would just fork off and spin off their own version right there and then.

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rings of trust, with torvalds at center.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
6 points (71.4% liked)

Linux

47345 readers
1442 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS