186
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Evilphd666@hexbear.net to c/labour@hexbear.net

whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The other party will talk about believing something but get really waffley when it comes time to actually do the thing.

I transitioned just over 20 years ago, at the time in California I had no right to housing or employment (i.e. it was perfectly legal for a landord to say "we don't rent to your type"). Guess who changed that?

Also, if you live in a red state, the “harm reduction” argument doesn’t apply.

So you're saying it matters?

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Lol tough timing for that argument Newsom literally just vetoed a bill defending Trans people.

[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't believe this bill was that clear cut, I don't think Newsom did anything seriously wrong here. Did you read his response? I think it makes sense, as a trans person I agree with his vote.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
186 points (100.0% liked)

labour

7712 readers
1 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS